ezFolk Home MP3 Section Tabs & Tutorials Forums - Newest Messages Musical Instruments Books, CDs, & DVDs Other Stuff

ezFolk Forums Home 
Home Search search Menu menu Not logged in - Login | Register
ezFolk Forums > Other Instruments > Erhu > Why no love for Zhonghu here?

 Moderated by: Tony Provencher, Richard Hefner Page:    1  2  3  Next Page Last Page  
New Topic Reply Printer Friendly
Why no love for Zhonghu here?  Rate Topic 
AuthorPost
 Posted: Mon May 18th, 2009 01:16 pm
  PM Quote Reply
1st Post
Shanghai Angels
Approved
 

Joined: Sat Feb 2nd, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 194
Instrument Interest: Guitar, Harmonica, Mandolin, Fiddle, Keyboards, Other
Status: 
Offline
I enjoy playing my Zhonghu daily. It has a very round, deep and surprisingly sweet tone. In fact I played it way more than my Erhu now.

Yes, Erhu produces sweet nasally tone and is easier to play...but I definitely am in love with Zhonghu now :)

 

Who else plays Zhonghu here?

 

Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Mon May 18th, 2009 03:41 pm
  PM Quote Reply
2nd Post
huqiner
Approved
 

Joined: Wed Jul 30th, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 125
Instrument Interest: Other
Status: 
Offline
delete mistake

Last edited on Mon May 18th, 2009 03:46 pm by huqiner

Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Mon May 18th, 2009 03:45 pm
  PM Quote Reply
3rd Post
huqiner
Approved
 

Joined: Wed Jul 30th, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 125
Instrument Interest: Other
Status: 
Offline
Well basically, the zhonghu is just a slightly lower pitched erhu! There aren't many solo pieces for the zhonghu, and in a traditional style ensemble, the zhonghu just plays a variation of the basic melody, same as any other traditional instrument.

I'm sure we would all love to hear a sound clip of you playing your zhonghu! I'm requesting "On Grassland" 草原上(cǎo yuán shàng) :)

Last edited on Mon May 18th, 2009 03:46 pm by huqiner

Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Mon May 18th, 2009 05:06 pm
  PM Quote Reply
4th Post
Den
Approved


Joined: Fri Nov 30th, 2007
Location: Weyauwega, Wisconsin USA
Posts: 330
Instrument Interest: Dulcimer, Other
Status: 
Offline
huqiner,  would you by chance have a www. link to that one?   I tried youtube and came up empty.

Den

Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Mon May 18th, 2009 05:38 pm
  PM Quote Reply
5th Post
huqiner
Approved
 

Joined: Wed Jul 30th, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 125
Instrument Interest: Other
Status: 
Offline
Played by Tian Zaili:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IdCTxI4j3-8

Played by Liu Mingyuan (arranger/composer)excerpt only
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZxrMgpSSJfw

another one:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rjb8jCI3YRI

I haven't seen these videos yet.

It helps to try a search using characters as well, 草原上, as there are variations in the English titles, eg On Grassland, On the Prairie etc, and some videos only have characters.

Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Mon May 18th, 2009 05:40 pm
  PM Quote Reply
6th Post
huqiner
Approved
 

Joined: Wed Jul 30th, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 125
Instrument Interest: Other
Status: 
Offline
Sheet music:
http://blog.zjol.com.cn/uploadfile/2007-1/110692709.gif

Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Mon May 18th, 2009 06:09 pm
  PM Quote Reply
7th Post
Den
Approved


Joined: Fri Nov 30th, 2007
Location: Weyauwega, Wisconsin USA
Posts: 330
Instrument Interest: Dulcimer, Other
Status: 
Offline
huqiner,   thanks for the links !

Den

Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Tue May 19th, 2009 02:35 am
  PM Quote Reply
8th Post
davidmdahl
Approved
 

Joined: Thu Jul 20th, 2006
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 334
Instrument Interest: Other
Status: 
Offline
I tend to prefer low instruments, so I expected to really enjoy playing zhonghu. As it turned out, I found my zhonghu to be a lot more work than was pleasant. It is okay to play a few tunes, but an afternoon on the zhonghu really wears me out. In my teacher's ensemble, the zhonghu was a bit over-bearing and boomy. The erquan erhu has worked out a lot better musically and is more agile. Maybe if we had the time and energy to make arrangements that suit the zhonghu, it would work out. So far though, the erquan erhu is working out beautifully.

Best wishes,

David

Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Tue May 19th, 2009 03:27 am
  PM Quote Reply
9th Post
ychent
Approved


Joined: Thu Jan 8th, 2009
Location:  
Posts: 61
Instrument Interest: Other
Status: 
Offline
Can erquan erhu essentially be used interchangeably with zhonghu? Or does zhonghu has its own distinct musicality that cannot be replicated? Meaning, can we ever expect the zhonghu section to be infiltrated by erquan erhu some day?

Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Tue May 19th, 2009 03:43 am
  PM Quote Reply
10th Post
Shanghai Angels
Approved
 

Joined: Sat Feb 2nd, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 194
Instrument Interest: Guitar, Harmonica, Mandolin, Fiddle, Keyboards, Other
Status: 
Offline
Zhonghu has bigger body, longer neck, bigger bridge, thicker bow, more snake skin surface. Everything is bigger than Erquan erhu...so logically Zhonghu's tone will be much deeper, bigger and rounder.

Erquan erhu is akin to putting viola strings on a violin and trying to make the violin sound like a viola....which will get you 'somewhere'...but due to the smaller violin body...it will never sound as deep as a bigger bodied viola.

Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Tue May 19th, 2009 03:53 am
  PM Quote Reply
11th Post
ychent
Approved


Joined: Thu Jan 8th, 2009
Location:  
Posts: 61
Instrument Interest: Other
Status: 
Offline
Has anyone tried using erquan strings on zhonghu? Maybe that could improve the sensitivity of the instrument?

Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Tue May 19th, 2009 04:46 am
  PM Quote Reply
12th Post
davidmdahl
Approved
 

Joined: Thu Jul 20th, 2006
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 334
Instrument Interest: Other
Status: 
Offline
Shanghai Angels wrote: Erquan erhu is akin to putting viola strings on a violin and trying to make the violin sound like a viola....which will get you 'somewhere'...but due to the smaller violin body...it will never sound as deep as a bigger bodied viola.
I don't agree with this analogy. A true erquan erhu is actually a little larger than a "typical" erhu. No, the erquan strings do not turn an erhu or an erquan erhu into a zhonghu, but the result is pretty successful. Don't knock it until you have tried it.

I suspect that the zhonghu is best used in a larger ensemble or orchestra. I don't like it as a solo instrument, and it is over-powering in a small ensemble. That is my opinion born of my own experience with the zhonghu. How many recordings can you find of the zhonghu outside of an orchestra, compared with erhu? It is a nitch instrument.

Best wishes,

David

Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Tue May 19th, 2009 04:51 am
  PM Quote Reply
13th Post
Shanghai Angels
Approved
 

Joined: Sat Feb 2nd, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 194
Instrument Interest: Guitar, Harmonica, Mandolin, Fiddle, Keyboards, Other
Status: 
Offline
David...I really wish to hear more Zhonghu recordings. It really is a lovely instrument especially if you tie the Qianjin high up...which will make the Zhonghu less bassy but you get more brilliance and sweeter tone.

Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Tue May 19th, 2009 05:25 am
  PM Quote Reply
14th Post
davidmdahl
Approved
 

Joined: Thu Jul 20th, 2006
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 334
Instrument Interest: Other
Status: 
Offline
ychent wrote: Can erquan erhu essentially be used interchangeably with zhonghu? Or does zhonghu has its own distinct musicality that cannot be replicated? Meaning, can we ever expect the zhonghu section to be infiltrated by erquan erhu some day?

I think that the zhonghu has an important role in the orchestra that cannot be replaced by an erquan erhu. The latter is a more agile solo instrument, but the zhonghu has more power and is better at filling in the bottom end.

In a smaller ensemble, the erquan erhu is lovely, and has just the right sort of voice. I can double the gaohu or erhu part, other than the twiddley bits, and it doesn't sound so much like a dancing hippo.

Use the right tool for the job. If it sounds good, it is good.

Best wishes,

David

Last edited on Tue May 19th, 2009 03:38 pm by davidmdahl

Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Tue May 19th, 2009 06:42 am
  PM Quote Reply
15th Post
Shanghai Angels
Approved
 

Joined: Sat Feb 2nd, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 194
Instrument Interest: Guitar, Harmonica, Mandolin, Fiddle, Keyboards, Other
Status: 
Offline
David...well said! Zhonghu and Erquan both has its place. It really depends on the application.

Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Tue May 19th, 2009 07:31 am
  PM Quote Reply
16th Post
may
Approved


Joined: Wed Jan 31st, 2007
Location: Los Angeles, California USA
Posts: 46
Instrument Interest: Guitar, Mandolin, Keyboards, Other
Status: 
Offline
Hello David!

My teacher told me the same thing that you said. That the true erquan erhu body is slightly bigger than the regular erhu.

He showed me his new erquan erhu and it was exquisite! Very large and even scales on the snake skin, and vintage rose wood. When I was done drooling over it, I noticed it had a wider body than the regular erhu. He said a real erquan erhu has a wider body and thicker snake skin. And when he played it, the sound was rich and  kind of soulful, great volume. I love it!

Anyway, I've never heard anyone else mention that the erquan body is larger than regular erhu, except for teacher, well, until I read your post. That's good confirmation. 

Recently, my teacher has been urging me to buy an erquan erhu. He said it's better if I had that when playing certain songs. He told me to custom order one like he did, but I can't afford that. I asked him about erquan erhus that look basically like the regular erhus, but he  insisted that those wouldn't be a "real" erquan erhus then. Well, I'll just have to use whatever I can find.

: ) May

 

davidmdahl wrote:

Shanghai Angels wrote: Erquan erhu is akin to putting viola strings on a violin and trying to make the violin sound like a viola....which will get you 'somewhere'...but due to the smaller violin body...it will never sound as deep as a bigger bodied viola.
I don't agree with this analogy. A true erquan erhu is actually a little larger than a "typical" erhu. No, the erquan strings do not turn an erhu or an erquan erhu into a zhonghu, but the result is pretty successful. Don't knock it until you have tried it.

I suspect that the zhonghu is best used in a larger ensemble or orchestra. I don't like it as a solo instrument, and it is over-powering in a small ensemble. That is my opinion born of my own experience with the zhonghu. How many recordings can you find of the zhonghu outside of an orchestra, compared with erhu? It is a nitch instrument.

Best wishes,

David

Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Tue May 19th, 2009 04:31 pm
  PM Quote Reply
17th Post
Shanghai Angels
Approved
 

Joined: Sat Feb 2nd, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 194
Instrument Interest: Guitar, Harmonica, Mandolin, Fiddle, Keyboards, Other
Status: 
Offline
whether it is zhonghu, erquan or regular erhu...the all important factor is that you must enjoy playing it. Playing these instruments do not tire you easily...unlike a violin or viola.

i can play Erhu and Zhonghu for 2 hours straight! :-)That's cos I enjoy playing it...and time does not exist anymore.

Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Tue May 19th, 2009 05:36 pm
  PM Quote Reply
18th Post
davidmdahl
Approved
 

Joined: Thu Jul 20th, 2006
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 334
Instrument Interest: Other
Status: 
Offline
may wrote:
Recently, my teacher has been urging me to buy an erquan erhu. He said it's better if I had that when playing certain songs. He told me to custom order one like he did, but I can't afford that. I asked him about erquan erhus that look basically like the regular erhus, but he  insisted that those wouldn't be a "real" erquan erhus then. Well, I'll just have to use whatever I can find.




I would expect a true erquan erhu to have more of the right stuff for playing at low pitch than an erhu with erquan strings, but as you mention, not everyone can afford that. According to my teacher, it is common and acceptible to use a standard erhu with the erquan strings. I happened to luck into an excellent combination of the 'right' erquan strings that really suit a fine erhu I have. It would be a very expensive and rare erquan erhu that would be better.

I think that it might be a good tactic to use an erquan string equipped erhu to start with, and and maybe later acquire a true erquan erhu if a good one became available. It would be a drag to spend a lot of money on a erquan erhu if you don't play it much.

Best wishes,

David

Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Tue May 19th, 2009 06:21 pm
  PM Quote Reply
19th Post
ychent
Approved


Joined: Thu Jan 8th, 2009
Location:  
Posts: 61
Instrument Interest: Other
Status: 
Offline
I am still curious if anyone has ever tried pairing erquan strings on zhonghu and see if it improves the responsiveness. If I roused anyone's curiosity, please let us know the result of your experiment!

Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Tue May 19th, 2009 10:48 pm
  PM Quote Reply
20th Post
davidmdahl
Approved
 

Joined: Thu Jul 20th, 2006
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 334
Instrument Interest: Other
Status: 
Offline
ychent wrote: I am still curious if anyone has ever tried pairing erquan strings on zhonghu and see if it improves the responsiveness. If I roused anyone's curiosity, please let us know the result of your experiment!

I am not quite curious enough myself to try this. I might if I was going to change strings on the zhonghu anyway, but I don't want to risk messing them up. Once strings have been removed, they are a lot harder to get back on without a kink. Why don't you try it? <g>

Best wishes,

David

Back To Top PM Quote Reply

Current time is 01:04 am Page:    1  2  3  Next Page Last Page    
ezFolk Forums > Other Instruments > Erhu > Why no love for Zhonghu here? Top




UltraBB 1.17 Copyright © 2007-2008 Data 1 Systems
Page processed in 0.5800 seconds (7% database + 93% PHP). 31 queries executed.